Al, not insignificant or short, LOL ;). Your point on synchronization of policy and science is important especially with the change of administration. Policy, threat, risk , and warfighter needs should be the bedrock for how we strategize forward across the CB spectrum. Nobody wants to be on the 60 minutes special of what we could have/should have done. Nor do we want our commanders in the field to have to figure out how to answer the questions...that is on the department. Agree, we need to continue improving strategic planning/communications around science, policy and ensuring our warfighters outmatch adversarial efforts against us in the future. Appreciate the observations and recommendations as they do synch with many perspectives engaged in the fight. Good fuel for the fire.
Al, not insignificant or short, LOL ;). Your point on synchronization of policy and science is important especially with the change of administration. Policy, threat, risk , and warfighter needs should be the bedrock for how we strategize forward across the CB spectrum. Nobody wants to be on the 60 minutes special of what we could have/should have done. Nor do we want our commanders in the field to have to figure out how to answer the questions...that is on the department. Agree, we need to continue improving strategic planning/communications around science, policy and ensuring our warfighters outmatch adversarial efforts against us in the future. Appreciate the observations and recommendations as they do synch with many perspectives engaged in the fight. Good fuel for the fire.